If there are no verified facts then no allegations should be made. If there are verified facts, they should be noted in neutral tone of language and preferably the sources should be mentioned or linked right in the text in question. However, if publisher has not made such changes, then the cause would propably be in the developer for getting 'to ambitious for given amount of time and funding' (developer and publisher propably have made agreements on these things) or 'the developer mismanaged the project' or whatever. For example 'FOO decided that the game should be released earlier than planned' or 'FOO cut the funding of the project' or something else. However, if the reason is in the publisher, then the article should mention why so. I agree it's a fact that in KOTOR II some cuts were done badly enough to leave holes, cause confusion and diminish enjoyment of the game. Cutting and removing content and changing design is routine game design. Also, content was removed from the game proper, although most of the content can be found inside the game files.ДЇirst: this doesn't read like text in a encyclopedic article. This production rush resulted in a sizable number of bugs, occasionally crippling gameplay. The game's developer Obsidian, was forced by LucasArts to rush the game out for a holiday release. Of particular note regarding the game is the perceived problems with its third act, or the 'endgame'. Whaddya think? - Maru Dubshinki 01:32 AM Sunday, 20 March 2005 Yes nice going on the Atris article. Cbarbry 19:09, (UTC) Thank you for hearing me out - Psi edit I've expanded the Atris article. Rjo 04:03, (UTC) Sorry when we copy a page to SWW, we intend to give credit in the talk page. You should probably bring this up with User:Cbarbry on his talk page, since he is the one who copied the article over. From what I can gather just by a quick look around is that the articles moved to SW Wiki still need to have their authorship acknowledged as per Wikipedia:Verbatim copying and Wikipedia:Copyrights#Users'_rights_and_obligations. Psi edit There's been discussion about this in places like Wikipedia:Village pump#Star_Wars_Wiki. Note they also have done this to the Handmaiden article I redirected the link back to Wikipedia's article. Some of the work that people (and me) did for the Atris article on Wikipedia are on the Star Wars Wiki Atris article this is not right because the people (and me) who worked on the original article on Wikipedia are not receiving the credit for the article on Star Wars Wiki (I think this may conflict with the Wiki site rule of not posting copyrighted work). If other pages follow this example of linking Wikipedia's Star Wars related articles to Star Wars Wiki's articles then Wikipedia's Star Wars articles will remain unused and unread destroying their purpose.Дў. I do not think this is right because of 2 reasons.

If you click the Article link Atris you will notice that it does not send to Wikipedia's article on Atris instead it links you to Star Wars Wiki's article on Atris. You also have guest apperances from many of the characters (Though the origin of the Cut Ending still needs work.) - Maru Dubshinki Maru Dubshinki T3-M4, HK-47, and Canderous - Rjo 18:12, (UTC) Ah. I'm not sure this is right- I played through and didn't see any hint whatsoever that 'a few' join the party, unless Canderous Ordo and Hk-47 alone count as a 'few'.

'Several characters featured in the first game are also brought into this sequel, and a few can join the main character's party.'

27 Merging Team Gizka With the KotOR II Article.

26 Fair use rationale for Image:KotorIIbox.jpg.

13 Lack of any coverage of critical reaction.

Kotor 2 get lightsaber from atris